Showing posts with label Race analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Race analysis. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Tom King Rewind

I can't express how happy I am that Tom King is over. I will be even more happy when Powerman is over this weekend. It is time like this that I truly wonder where my desire comes from to continue participating in this sport trying to achieve a higher level. But in the end, I know these decisions are just tough. And when you make tough decisions, then the outcome isn't always fun. You look for the lining--and sometimes it is character building.

It took me about a week to shake off my Tom King performance. I was at peace with it...for the most part. Sure I was unhappy but I have never once regretted backing off and shutting it down. I KNOW that was the right decision. However, there were a number of key mistakes I made in training all along the way. I think in the days leading up to the event, I began to realize them. Or maybe I just accepted what I knew all along.

1. Over-reaching. This race was simply me over reaching for a goal. I want to be a sub 1:30 half marathoner. But I am not. I am not. I am not. I am close, but I am not there yet. All the race day calculators told me I would run a 1:34. I wouldn't listen. And I began lying to myself. I convinced myself that the flat terrain would give me an advantage. I convinced myself that my 5k time would be faster. I simple over reached.

2. Failure of long runs. Well I knew this was going to be a problem. I knew I could run 13.1 miles...and I did. But the lack of longer tempo runs. Or strong negative splits prevented me from staying strong for 90+ minutes.

3. Over reliance of mile repeats. Nearly each Tuesday I did mile repeats in the park. I usually did 3-5 at HM pace. Easy peasy. No problem at all. I cut the recovery times in half and could pound them out. But I nearly always had an excuse as to why the workouts wasn't 6-8 repeats.

4. Over estimation of volume impact. Jury is still out on my volume experiment. I am still not convinced that more volume for the sake of volume is good for me. When I did the 50 runs in 50 days I started down a path and transferred over to race specific training. I became really efficient at running 3-5 miles. I have no doubt that my 5k likely improved. But all that volume didn't do much for my longer endurance needs. Consistency is great but it needs to be aligned with your goals.

5. Obsession with a time. This is a lesson that I continually learn the hard way. Three years ago, I took a DNF at NOLA 70.3 because I was chasing the wrong carrot. At Tom King that carrot returned. I wouldn't simply let things just be. I wanted the wrong carrot and it messes with me mentally.

The race is over. My legs are still a bit fatigued. I didn't plan on running much between the race and Powerman. Once the next race is over, I feel like I can back off the throttle a bit and let go of the early season longer races.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Indian Springs Analysis

I know I have said this a million time but it is really difficult being your own worst critic. In this sport we are often looking for a silver lining that doesn't exist. There is no such thing as a perfect race. It will never happen. So you have to just accept it. All you can focus on is giving it 100%--from start to finish.

I spent most of Saturday pissed off about this race. I refused to acknowledge the numerous improvements. All I could focus on is that I got mowed down on the run. I failed to recognize the other accomplishments like significantly beating my time from last year, riding at 20+ more watts, feeling better after the race. Those are the keys to success. It is often hard to keep that in mind when you have a particular burning image in your head.

Race Analysis:





Swim T1BikeT2RunOverall
Andrew0:12:090:00:560:38:410:00:420:23:041:15:34
Top 100:10:340:00:490:37:480:00:420:19:561:09:50
Fastest0:09:240:00:350:35:440:00:250:18:001:07:15
Overall (408) 51 52 15 17 74 26
AG Rank (35) 11 8 2 2 10 8

Year to Year Comparison



20092010
Swim 0:11:590:12:09
T10:00:580:00:56
Bike0:39:530:38:41
T20:00:550:00:42
Run0:24:180:23:04
Overall1:18:061:15:34
OA Rank 49 26
AG Rank 7 8


Swim: Obviously I am disappointed here. I saw progress in my first two races but my last two were completely flat in this area. However, I will say that I feel like I am exiting the water feeling better. I have talked to the Masters coach and really need to anchor down in July and August to see some improvement on my swim.

Transitions: Nothing to note here. I certainly didn't give up time here.

Bike: Big improvement here. My power looked much better. And the results show that people weren't riding away from me. I also shaved 1:20 off my time. That is huge in a small race

Run: While it sucked in a big way, I didn't drop 1:15 or nearly 25s per mile. I need to drop the negative thoughts and view that as an accomplishment.

Overall time: I shaved over 2:30 minutes off a spint which pleases me.

The interesting thing to note is my rankings. I moved up nearly 20 spots overall despite the race having 50 more people than last year. But I dropped a spot in my age group when 14 more people joined.

I used to benchmark myself against how I did in my age group but I don't think that is solid anymore. These results show why. Once you enter 30+ age groups, they all suck. They are just fast. I placed 26th overall. 25 people beat me and 7 of them are in my age group alone. That is a crowded field.




Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Rev3 Anaysis and Thanks

The timing and race results for Rev3 aren't in a standard format so conducting solid analysis wasn't as easy as downloading the results. It took more research and I am unable to produce the typical table that I enjoy using.







Swimt1Biket2 RunTotal
Top 100:29:050:02:342:32:290:02:131:29:494:36:12
Andrew0:31:570:02:272:40:310:02:121:45:405:02:49
OA place after leg 27 23 15 14 23 27
AG place after leg 10 7 5 4 7 7



Looking at the results, I feel even better about the race. I am very happy with my swim. Definitely a PR and I assume that I had some help from a short course or current. However, the leaders times don't strike me as super fast. Hopefully, my swim is in a better place than before.

I am always amazed with transition. It seems that in the races where I slow down, I get out of there the fastest. I felt really slow in transition as I took my time. But comparatively, I was in an out. However there is an anomaly in the Top 10. One guy took a nap, so their average is just under 2:00.



I was a little surprised to see such a margin on the bike. But clearly there were some strong athletes at the top. I know I rode it conservatively but even still, I don't know I could shave 8 minutes off my time on that course. I think realistically I could have shaved 5 by riding a bit more aggressive. Not that I am second guessing myself.

The run was about what I expected. I didn't quite get mowed down but there is a clear distinction between real runners and what I attempted to do. It was a solid run for me but I am still out of my league in this area. My open HM time was only better than one person in the top 10.

Retrospect

A lot of people have asked me why I didn't try to squeeze out that final 2:49. I know I could have done that easily. If I was to have the same race again, then I would make a few adjustments that would have saved me at least 3 minutes. But that wasn't the point of the race. I wasn't trying to go sub-5. I actually didn't think it was all that possible for me on that course.

As I mentioned, I knew when I started the run it was possible. But when I began to bonk I saw it slip away. But I was not willing to give up on an otherwise great race. I kept trying to push. So I definitely don't regret not pushing at times to save another 2:49. I think I executed like I want in races. Plus it still leaves a small carrot in front of me. I know sub-5 is achievable for me on a number of course so I am not overly worried about it.

I am however, slightly mad at myself for not pushing harder on the run. I let a guy in my age group pass me on the final hill. I let another pass me with about a mile and half to go. I shouldn't allow this to happen that late in a race. I need to remember that it is a race until the finish line. I don't care that I would have been 5th rather than 7th in my age group. I care more that I let down my guard.

Kudos

I need to provide a few kudos to people that helped me along the way. First, thanks to all3sports for believing in me and providing me the gear and technical expertise to perform well. It is a different feeling when you know you represent a notable brand out there. Second, I want to thank Dan Arnett and Endurance Concepts for his coaching and guidance. I have trained with Dan for two years and there is no doubt that I am a better athlete today from the experience.

Finally, and most importantly, I want to thank my loving girlfriend, Jessica. She continues to show me unbelievable support in my racing and goes far beyond what is expected of her. This marks the second straight year that she sacrificed her Mother's Day to tend to my needs. For that and the countless other things she does, I am a very lucky and grateful person.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Indian Springs by the numbers...


Well the data confirms what I already knew. Within my age group, I came back into T2 in 3rd place then I got run down. It really is defeating to look at how out of line my OA ranks are. Guess it is time to attack that weakness and change that.



SwimT1BikeT2RunOverall
Fastest8:390:300:35:450:200:16:551:06:22
Benchmark10:330:450:37:340:410:19:401:09:11
Andrew11:590:590:39:530:550:24:181:18:06
AG Rank (32)
7546136
OA Rank (424)
635228799038